Finally, Incontrovertible Evidence that Women are Nuts
My latest read is a good one, and you should read it, too. It's called Blink, by Malcolm Gladwell, who has one of the indisputably coolest jobs in America: he thinks about things, talks to cool people, and writes about it for the New Yorker. Well, I guess it depends on your idea of cool, but to a geek like me, that's pretty much the top.
Blink is about the unconscious mind. It's about the part of our brain that can take in information from the environment, analyze it, and whisper intuitions in our ears--all without us being consciously aware that this is taking place. How does this prove that women are nuts? One of the studies that Gladwell writes about in Blink was done on a group of young men and women engaged in speed-dating.
To grossly simplify: the researchers ask a woman, prior to the experiment, what she's looking for in a man. She gives a reply, say, that she's after an intelligent, caring guy who will treat her well and be dependable. Okay, fine. Now on to the dating! The woman is paired with a number of men and she has chemistry with one of them. They exchange numbers, and so forth. Turns out this guy is tall and handsome, wealthy, and very self-confident. In the exit interview, the researchers ask the woman what she's looking for in a relationship once again, except now she says, "I'm really looking for a man who's tall, handsome, and very sure of himself. And it would really help if he was well off." Hmmm. And here's the kicker: they followed up with her several months later and asked the same question a third time. What do you think she responded? "I'm looking for a man who is intelligent, caring, and will treat me well."
That's not a fair representation of the study, but it captures the basic idea: that we (it's not just women) don't really consciously know what will attract us to another person. If we're asked to give a verbal accounting of our attraction, it's likely to be wrong. It's also likely to unstable and to be greatly affected by the current circumstance (e.g. if we've just had a connection with someone, that person's characteristics are likely to be cited as attractive). We're unlikely to learn from our experience.
What do we take away from all of this nonsense? Well, clearly women are nuts. But I guess men are nuts, too. So if you happen to stumble your way into a decent relationship, in spite of your ignorance of what you actually want, you better realize you've got a good thing going.

3 Comments:
i do speed-dating, except the girl doesn't know about it going in. i pull up, honk the horn, and make her sprint everywhere. it's like those bank robberies where they time themselves, but with more severe consequences, like me spending the rest of my life alone. i need to get things done, though, you know?
okay, as far as an actual response: i think it's interesting how short-sighted people can be. it's hard enough to just pick a type, and then find that type, without changing it up on yourself constantly. refer to my speed-dating method if you have questions.
This post was helpful in a conversation I had the other night! A guy that Neil works with is currently reading Tipping Point, and I thought.....Hey, isn't that the same guy that wrote Blink? The conversation actually didn't go too much further than that, so I don't know how helpful it was, but anyway........
hey, that's pretty interesting. thanks for posting. this is the kind of post you want to email to all your friends and say "check this out!" but then again some people might not be too crazy about it.
oh, hi erik. i'm sure it seems like i'm following your commenters around to their blogs. and yes, that is what i'm doing.
Post a Comment
<< Home